On July 5th, 2025, the news broke: Ingram Micro, one of the world’s largest IT distributors, was hit by a ransomware attack attributed to the SafePay group. Within hours, their ordering systems, cloud platforms, license provisioning, and customer portals were all rendered inoperable. What’s most striking isn’t just the size of the target, but how profoundly it has impacted Managed Service Providers (MSPs) worldwide.

This event is more than another ransomware headline. It exposes the deep structural fragility that exists in the MSP supply chain, and how even the most robust service providers can be brought to their knees when a key upstream partner goes dark.

The Ripple Effect: When One Link Fails, the Chain Snaps

Ingram Micro isn’t just a distributor. It’s a critical backbone for tens of thousands of MSPs. Their Xvantage platform, cloud service ordering tools, and license management interfaces are woven into the daily fabric of MSP operations.

So when SafePay reportedly exploited vulnerabilities in Ingram’s VPN setup (specifically, GlobalProtect from Palo Alto Networks), and ransomware began encrypting core systems, the impact was immediate and global:

• MSPs couldn’t place hardware orders
• Licenses couldn’t be provisioned or renewed
• Cloud subscriptions were in limbo
• Support teams were left in the dark

And the worst part? No one could get a clear update. For several days, even basic communication from Ingram was limited, leaving MSPs guessing, firefighting, and fielding tough questions from their own clients.

This wasn’t just a supplier having a bad day, this was business interruption at scale.

The Hidden Dependency Few Talk About

MSPs have spent years hardening their infrastructure—investing in cybersecurity training, patch management, MFA, SIEM platforms, and threat detection. But as the Ingram incident shows, many haven’t extended that same scrutiny to their supply chain risk.

In fact, most MSPs operate with an unspoken assumption:

“If we trust our vendors, we’ll be fine.”

That assumption is dangerous.

When your distributor is a single point of failure for licensing, billing, and hardware, you don’t own your business continuity plan. You’re outsourcing your stability to a third party, and you may not even realise it until things go wrong.

Reddit, Forums, and the MSP Reality Check

In the hours and days following the Ingram outage, MSPs took to Reddit, Discord, and private forums. The mood ranged from frustrated to panicked:

• “We can’t order anything. Our client needs a new machine and we’re stuck.”
• “No ETA from Ingram. How are we supposed to meet SLAs when our distributor can’t provision?”
• “Our PSA has 15 tickets all blocked waiting on licensing issues.”

Many asked the same questions:

• Why isn’t there a backup portal?
• Why don’t they have a secondary communications channel?
• What’s their DR plan—and do we ever get to see it?

These are questions MSPs themselves would expect their own clients to ask them. Yet the tables were turned.

What This Means for the Future of MSP Resilience

This incident isn’t a fluke. It’s a warning sign. And it’s not about Ingram specifically, it could’ve been any vendor, any distributor, any SaaS platform.

The truth is: MSPs need to reimagine what resilience really means in 2025 and beyond.

1. Single Supplier Dependency Must End

If all your Microsoft licenses, cloud subscriptions, or procurement workflows are tied to a single distributor or platform, your risk exposure is massive. Dual-distributor setups—or at least a process for emergency procurement via alternates—should be standard.

Even if your margins are slightly reduced, the insurance of continuity is worth the cost.

2. Vendor BCM and Security Due Diligence is Essential

Most MSPs ask clients to trust their vendors. But how many regularly assess the business continuity or ransomware response capabilities of their own key partners?

• Do you know your distributor’s RTO/RPO?
• Have they shared their cybersecurity policy?
• Can you access a sandboxed portal if their primary systems go offline?

If not, those are conversations that need to happen—before the next breach hits.

3. SLAs Should Flow Upstream, Not Just Down

It’s common for MSPs to offer SLAs to their clients. But how many vendors or distributors are held to similar standards?

Where possible, build vendor contracts that include penalties for critical service outages, or at least response-time guarantees during cyber incidents. At minimum, make sure you understand what your exposure is if they go dark.

4. Offline Playbooks and Emergency Workflow Planning

If licensing systems are down, how will you handle provisioning?

If ordering portals go offline, what are your manual procurement steps?

We help clients build BCP plans, but often forget to build them for ourselves. It’s time for MSPs to map out offline processes, backup communication lines, and interim workarounds—even for tasks that seem “cloud-native.”

5. Transparent Comms with Clients During Supply Chain Events

The temptation during vendor outages is to stay quiet. But transparent updates can be your saving grace:

• Acknowledge the issue
• Explain the cause (without throwing anyone under the bus)
• Outline your contingency steps
• Reassure clients that you’re in control—even if the upstream isn’t

Trust is built in the moments when things go wrong, not when everything’s working.

So What Happens Now?

The Ingram Micro outage will pass. Systems will recover. Reports will be filed. Lawsuits may follow.

But the MSPs who learn and evolve from this incident, those who reassess supply chain risk, diversify key dependencies, and implement stronger business continuity around vendors, will come out stronger.

This event should be the “WannaCry moment” for MSP operational design. A wake-up call that resilience doesn’t stop at your firewall, it stretches all the way up the supply stack.

MSPs are in the business of protecting others. But that protection often assumes stability from vendors and upstream partners. When those partners falter, as Ingram Micro just did, it reminds us of something sobering:

You are only as strong as your weakest critical dependency.

Let’s not waste this incident. Let it be a catalyst.